Impact Pledge score
The information provided in relation to each security issuer is for illustrative purposes only, is on a historic basis and does not mean that the security is currently held or will be held within an LGIM portfolio. This information does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
We have analysed companies in 'climate-critical' sectors against key sustainability indicators, drawing on independent data providers and our pioneering climate modelling. Through our transparent scoring methodology, we believe we can drive fundamental change in the market.
Warning on inappropriate usage of the tool
LGIM limits usage of this website to prevent reproduction, redistribution or any other form of copying or transmission of the data and information contained within the site.
Sorry, this report is currently unavailable.
We encountered an issue while retrieving this information for you. Please check your internet connection and refresh the page.
Introducing our Climate Impact Pledge score
Climate change is one of the defining issues of our time. Recognising the risks of dangerous, potentially catastrophic climate outcomes, we support efforts to limit greenhouse gas emissions to Net Zero by 2050, in line with the recommendations of the scientific community.
Under our dedicated engagement programme – the Climate Impact Pledge – we are committed to help companies to step up on their ambition towards Net Zero, build resilient strategies for this transformative transition period and succeed in the low-carbon world.
We use qualitative and quantitative measures to assess companies’ progress. We will publicly celebrate the successes we see in our companies, but also take voting and investment sanctions against companies falling behind. Our engagement has consequences.
Our assessment combines quantitative and qualitative indicators drawn from a range of data providers, which are made publicly available for circa 1000 large companies globally under a ‘traffic light’ system. By making our climate ratings publicly available, companies (and their stakeholders) are able to transparently verify progress.
We will follow our assessment with in-depth engagement with key companies whose actions have the potential to galvanise their sectors.
More details on the methodology are available here.
For more information on our expectations for a company in a specific sector, please see the sector methodology document in the indicator definitions.
Each individual indicator contributes equally to a theme, and each theme contributes equally to the 5 overall pillars shown (Governance, Strategy, Risks & Opportunities, Scenario Analysis, Metrics & Targets).
The overall pillar rating is to allow for comparability between companies. However, it is poor disclosure/performance against individual indicators that may lead to a voting or investment sanction from LGIM, rather than not meeting an overall rating threshold for a particular section. We encourage companies to address any gaps in their disclosures and strategies as reflected by our ‘traffic light’ indicators.
Have questions about the data?
We encourage companies to verify the accuracy of the data, which is sourced from third-party data providers as listed. In case of an inaccuracy, we expect companies to first verify their own public disclosures and contact the data providers directly to rectify them.